Wilson v. Taylor County, Kentucky, et al
Filing
8
ORDER Dismissing Case by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/23/2012. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's claims against Taylor County are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state claim, and that the claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state claims and for seeking monetary relief from Defendants, who are immune. This is a Final Order. The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith. cc:counsel, Defendants, Taylor County Attorney, Plaintiff, pro se. (PHB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT BOWLING GREEN
KEVIN WILSON
PLAINTIFF
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-P46-R
TAYLOR COUNTY et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date and being
otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Taylor County
are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) and that his claims against Defendants Amy Anderson, Craig Cox and John
Bertram are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim within the meaning of 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and for seeking monetary relief from Defendants who are immune under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2).
There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order.
The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith for
the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Date:
cc:
April 23, 2012
Plaintiff, pro se
Defendants
Taylor County Attorney
4413.009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?