Tate v. State of Tennessee et al

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 12/20/12 Dismissing Case with prejudice because the plaintiff made no response to the Defendant's various motions to dismiss. cc:counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-000124-JHM JOHN DANIEL TATE PLAINTIFF v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on various motions to dismiss and on the Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw [DN 29], which the Court will treat as a motion to voluntarily dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. The action is dismissed with prejudice because the Plaintiff made no response to the Defendants’ various motions to dismiss. cc: counsel of record December 20, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?