Tate v. State of Tennessee et al

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 12/20/12 Dismissing Case with prejudice because the plaintiff made no response to the Defendant's various motions to dismiss. cc:counsel, Plaintiff (pro se) (JBM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-000124-JHM
JOHN DANIEL TATE

PLAINTIFF

v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ET. AL.,

DEFENDANTS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on various motions to dismiss and on the Plaintiff’s motion
to withdraw [DN 29], which the Court will treat as a motion to voluntarily dismiss the action
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and the Court being sufficiently advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed. The action is dismissed with
prejudice because the Plaintiff made no response to the Defendants’ various motions to dismiss.

cc: counsel of record
December 20, 2012