Ragle et al v. Monticello Banking Company et al

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 9/4/2013. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Monticello Banking Company and Richard Owens' (acting in his official capacity for Monticello) Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED (DN 37 ) and Defendant Monticello is dismissed from this action. Defendant Monticello Banking Company's Motion to Strike Expert Testimony is DENIED as moot (DN 23 ). cc: Counsel (CDR)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?