Mize et al v. United States Marshal Service et al
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers that by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Warren County Attorney; U.S. Attorney (SG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
COREY MIZE
PLAINTIFF
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-171-GNS
U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE et al.
DEFENDANTS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered May 1, 2015, this Court ordered Plaintiff
Corey Mize to submit an amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form within 30 days. Plaintiff
was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of his case. Plaintiff did not comply.
By Order entered July 8, 2015, Plaintiff was instructed that he had an additional 21 days
in which to file his amended complaint on the appropriate form. He was again warned that
failure to comply would result in dismissal of his case.
The allotted time has passed, and Plaintiff has again failed to submit the amended
complaint form. Courts have an inherent power “acting on their own initiative, to clear their
calendars of cases that have remained dormant because of the inaction or dilatoriness of the
parties seeking relief.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962). Therefore, by
separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (governing
involuntary dismissal).
Date:
September 21, 2015
Greg N. Stivers, Judge
United States District Court
cc:
Plaintiff, pro se
Defendants
Warren County Attorney
U.S. Attorney
4416.009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?