Stoner v. Wills et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 10/8/2008, SUSTAINING 22 Motion to Dismiss. Claims against the City are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Remainder of Plaintiff's claims against the individual Defendants are TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Counsel (RLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07CV-572-H MARCUS STONER V. DANIEL WILLS, et al. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants have moved to dismiss the claims against them. The City of Shelbyville moved to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint has not stated a cause of action against it. The individual Defendants moved to dismiss on the grounds that venue is improper due to Plaintiff's residence in Shelby County, Kentucky. After reviewing the complaint, the Court finds that it fails to state a valid cause of action against the City of Shelbyville, because it does not state any specific action by the City nor any policy of the City which caused Plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff responded to the motion to dismiss the individual Defendants by suggesting transfer of the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. In view of Plaintiff's residence in Shelby County within the Eastern District, such request seems appropriate. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss of the City of Shelbyville is SUSTAINED and the claims against the City are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of Plaintiff's claims against the individual Defendants are TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. October 8, 2008 cc: Marcus Stoner, Pro Se Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?