Profitt v. Hefty et al

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 1/22/2010. The instant action will be dismissed, by separate Order, for failure to prosecute and to comply with a prior Order of this Court. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (AEP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE MICHAEL JASON PROFITT v. HEFTY AND GLADE TRASH BAG COMPANIES MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Michael Jason Profitt filed a pro se complaint along with an application to proceed without prepayment of fees. On review of the application, the Court found that most of the sections were left blank and that the application was, therefore, lacking information needed to determine whether Plaintiff meets the requirements for in forma pauperis status. Consequently, by Order entered November 20, 2009, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a fully completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the Order within 30 days would result in dismissal of the action. Well over thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with the Order or shown cause for said failure. Therefore, the instant action will be dismissed, by separate Order, for failure to prosecute and to comply with a prior Order of this Court. Date: January 22, 2010 PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09CV-622-S DEFENDANT cc: Plaintiff, pro se 4411.005

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?