House v. Fackler et al

Filing 38

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 3/8/2010. For the reasons set forth, 31 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying the motions for transfer is VACATED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Defendant Fackler a copy of 25 and 26 motions for transfer, 35 motion for preliminary injunction, and this Order via facsimile at the BCDC and via certified mail, return receipt requested. Defendant Fackler shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order to res pond to the motions. The motion for leave to amend the complaint ( 35 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a complaint form and affix the case number and "Fourth Amended Complaint" to the caption. cc: Plaintiff, pro se; Defendants; Bullitt County Attorney (AEP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09CV-935-H JAMES E. HOUSE v. DANNY FACKLER et al. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on a motion for an emergency preliminary injunction by Plaintiff (DN 35). In the motion, Plaintiff states that he is housed at KCPC.1 Plaintiff states that he was transferred there from Bullitt County Detention Center (BCDC) for medical testing on February 3, 2010, on a temporary basis. Plaintiff states that on January 26, 2010, before he was transferred to KCPC, BCDC Deputy Bratcher sexually and physically assaulted him. He also states that he was told by a jail trustee that he was going to be killed or hurt badly and that he was subjected to retaliation, abuse, and assault by jail deputies and Defendant Danny Fackler. Plaintiff states that he is about to be transferred back to BCDC from KCPC. He states that he fears that the BCDC staff will kill him if he is returned there. Plaintiff filed a previous motion for transport to Louisville Metro Corrections (DN 26) and a letter requesting to be transferred, which the Court construes as a motion for transfer (DN 25). In the motions, Plaintiff states that he believes that his life is at risk and that he "was told by a trustee that [Jailer] Danny Fackler was talking to one of the Guards about hurting me, maybe even taking my life." The Court denied the motions on February 19, 2010, because Plaintiff's DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF 1 The Court takes judicial notice that KCPC is the Kentucky Correctional Psychiatric Center. claim for injunctive relief was mooted by his transfer to KCPC. Since Plaintiff states that he is about to be returned to BCDC,2 IT IS ORDERED that the memorandum opinion and order denying the motion for transfer (DN 31) is VACATED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Defendant Fackler a copy of the motions for transfer (DNs 25 and 26), motion for emergency preliminary injunction (DN 35), and this Order via facsimile at the BCDC and via certified mail, return receipt requested. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Fackler shall have 14 days from the date of entry of this Order to respond to the motions for transfer (DNs 25 and 26) and motion for emergency preliminary injunction (DN 35). Because the motions for transfer and motion for emergency preliminary injunction make new allegations against Deputy Bratcher and others, the Court will also construe the motion for emergency preliminary injunction as a motion for leave to amend the complaint. Upon review, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend the complaint (DN 35) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint form and affix the case number and "Fourth Amended Complaint" to the caption. Should Plaintiff wish to amend the complaint to add Deputy Bratcher as a Defendant or add any claims against Defendant Fackler or other individuals, he may do so on the form. Date: March 8, 2010 cc: Plaintiff, pro se Defendants Bullitt County Attorney 4412.010 The Court notes that the VINE Link website shows that Plaintiff is currently in custody at the BCDC. See www.vinelink.com. 2 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?