Plummer v. Brown

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 1/30/2012; by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant action for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a prior Order of this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).cc: plaintiff pro se (TLB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
CLAUDE PLUMMER

PLAINTIFF

v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11CV-P623-H

PAT BROWN

DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Claude Plummer filed a pro se civil complaint on his own paper. Under the Court’s
Local Rules, pro se complaints generally should be written on court-supplied forms. See LR 5.2.
Therefore, by Order entered December 12, 2011, the Court directed Plaintiff to fill out and return
the appropriate form to the Court. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply within
30 days would result in dismissal of this action.
The response time has expired with Plaintiff having neither responded nor shown good
cause for his failure to do so. Accordingly, by separate Order, the Court will dismiss the instant
action for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a prior Order of this Court pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Date:

January 30, 2012

cc:
Plaintiff, pro se
4412.005