Hardison v. Denison et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 12/19/12 Dismissing Case with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinioncc:counsel, pro se petitioner (MLG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
JAMES HARDISON

PLAINTIFF

v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-P187-S

TIMOTHY DENISON et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date and being
otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with
prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).
There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order.
The Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith for
the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Date:

cc:

December 19, 2012

Plaintiff, pro se
Defendants
4411.009