Lamb v. Howard et al
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge John G. Heyburn, II on 07/07/2014 re 7 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Kentucky State Police and KSP Trooper Brandon Brooks for summary judgment is SUSTAINED and the complaint against them is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No otherclaims or causes of action remain. This is a final and appealable order. cc: Counsel of Record; Zachary Amos Lamb (TJD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-301-H
ZACHARY LAMB
PLAINTIFF
v.
JENNIFER OLDHAM, et al.
DEFENDANTS
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The remaining Defendants in this case, Department of Kentucky State Police (“KSP”)
and KSP Trooper Brandon Brooks (“Brooks”) have each moved to dismiss the complaint on the
grounds that they each possess immunity from lawsuit under the circumstances, and that the
charges in the complaint are barred due to the finding of probable cause by the grand jury.
Plaintiff’s response is that the various parties involved acted outside their official responsibilities
and lied or otherwise conspired to cause his conviction on the charges. The Court has reviewed
all the motions and the complaint and concludes that this matter can be resolved in a relatively
straightforward fashion.
It is factually undisputed that on November 25, 2012, Brooks was on patrol in Hardin
County when he stopped Plaintiff’s vehicle for speeding at 87 miles an hour, which is
approximately 17 miles an hour over the speed limit. Brooks ultimately arrested Plaintiff and
charged him with speeding, having an expired registration, an expired registration receipt, the
failure to maintain required insurance, failure to have an operator’s license and display of an
expired or fictitious operator’s license. On April 25, 2013, the Hardin County grand jury
indicted Plaintiff on all the misdemeanor charges. The grand jury did return a “no true bill” for
the criminal possession of a forged instrument. The matter was brought to trial in Hardin
District Court on October 16, 2013, and Plaintiff was found guilty on all charges. He
subsequently appealed to Hardin Circuit Court where that judgment was affirmed. Thereafter,
Plaintiff instituted this action. The Court has already dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against two
Hardin County judges.
There are a number of reasons why the remaining charges against KSP and Brooks must
be dismissed. Primarily, all of the misdemeanor charges against Plaintiff were tried in Hardin
District Court and Plaintiff was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Consequently, he
cannot now claim that these Defendants acted outside their official responsibilities or act in a
way outside their authority. All of Plaintiff’s current civil causes of action are barred due to the
guilty verdicts in Hardin District Court. Plaintiff cannot now argue that his arrest or charges
were without probable cause because a grand jury and a jury has determined the conclusive
existence of probable cause. See Higgason v. Stephens, 288 F.3d 868, 877 (6th Cir. 2002).
For all of these reasons and others set forth in Defendants’ motion for summary judgment
and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of KSP and Brooks for summary judgment is
SUSTAINED and the complaint against them is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. No other
claims or causes of action remain.
This is a final and appealable order.
July 7, 2014
cc:
Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?