Miller v. Coty, Inc. et al
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/21/2018: Defendants' Motion in Limine 55 is administratively REMANDED; and the Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine 56 is administratively REMANDED. cc: Counsel (JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
MAY MILLER and
TIMOTHY MILLER
PLAINTIFFS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-00443-CRS
v.
COTY, INC. and
COTY US, LLC
DEFENDANTS
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on two motions. The Defendants, Coty, Inc. and Coty
US, LLC, move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 55). The Plaintiffs, May Miller and
Timothy Miller, also move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 56). The parties timely
filed the motions pursuant to the Amended Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Colin
Lindsay (DN 50). However, a trial date not having been scheduled at this time, the Court will
administratively remand the motions in limine. The Court will consider the motions of the parties
after a trial date has been scheduled.
For the reasons stated above, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) the Defendants’ Motion in Limine (DN 55) is administratively REMANDED; and
(2) the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (DN 56) is administratively REMANDED;
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 21, 2018
C al R Smpo I , ei J d e
h r s . i sn I Sno u g
e
I
r
U i dSae Ds i C ut
nt tt ir t o r
e
s tc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?