Miller v. Coty, Inc. et al

Filing 70

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 3/21/2018: Defendants' Motion in Limine 55 is administratively REMANDED; and the Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine 56 is administratively REMANDED. cc: Counsel (JM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE MAY MILLER and TIMOTHY MILLER PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-cv-00443-CRS v. COTY, INC. and COTY US, LLC DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on two motions. The Defendants, Coty, Inc. and Coty US, LLC, move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 55). The Plaintiffs, May Miller and Timothy Miller, also move the Court to enter an order In Limine (DN 56). The parties timely filed the motions pursuant to the Amended Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Colin Lindsay (DN 50). However, a trial date not having been scheduled at this time, the Court will administratively remand the motions in limine. The Court will consider the motions of the parties after a trial date has been scheduled. For the reasons stated above, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: (1) the Defendants’ Motion in Limine (DN 55) is administratively REMANDED; and (2) the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine (DN 56) is administratively REMANDED; IT IS SO ORDERED. March 21, 2018 C al R Smpo I , ei J d e h r s . i sn I Sno u g e I r U i dSae Ds i C ut nt tt ir t o r e s tc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?