Sypher v. United States of America
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge John G. Heyburn, II that the court lacks subject-matter-jurisdiction. cc: Plaintiffs, pro se; Warden, SCI Benner Township. (SG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
KAREN CUNAGIN SYPHER
PLAINTIFF
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3-14-CV-472-H
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is what purports to be a habeas corpus petition filed by non-lawyers
Christopher Wirth and Jeffery Mays, who are incarcerated by the Pennsylvania Department of
Corrections and who identify themselves as “‘next friend’ personal and legal representative for
Karen Cunagin Sypher.” Wirth and Mays give a number of purported reasons why Ms. Sypher
needs to be released from prison to receive medical treatment. They offer no explanation as to
why they would be privy to this information about Ms. Sypher, who is incarcerated in a federal
prison in Alabama.
Pro se litigants may act as their own counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. However, they are
not authorized to represent others in federal court. See, e.g., Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963,
970 (6th Cir. 2002) (“pro se” means to appear for one’s self; thus, one person may not appear on
another person’s behalf in the other’s cause). Moreover, litigants may only assert those claims
which are personal to them. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975); see also Coal Operators
& Assoc., Inc. v. Babbitt, 291 F.3d 912, 915-16 (6th Cir. 2002). Thus, Wirth and Mays lack
standing to file a habeas petition on behalf of Ms. Sypher. Therefore, this petition will be
dismissed as frivolous for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Babbitt, 291 F.3d at 915
(“[S]tanding to sue . . . is a jurisdictional requirement.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (“If the court
determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the
action.”).
Moreover, the return address for Wirth and Mays is “301 Institution Dr., Bellefonte, PA
16823.” That return address is a Pennsylvania state prison. A review of the Pennsylvania
Department of Corrections’ website reveals that an inmate named Jonathan Lee Riches, well
known to this Court, is housed at SCI Benner Township located at the same address as that listed
in the return address. Riches has filed numerous similarly frivolous and scandalous actions
naming celebrities/public figures as plaintiffs and defendants in this Court and in other federal
district courts throughout the country. The Court considers the possibility that, since this
petition was mailed from the institution where Riches is incarcerated and it contains scandalous
allegations similar to the types of allegations made by Riches in the past, this action may have
been filed by Riches. For this reason, the Court directs that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion
be sent to the Warden at SCI Benner Township in case the Warden would like to investigate
whether Riches is filing frivolous and scandalous lawsuits naming individuals as Plaintiffs
without their knowledge and/or filing legal documents under other prisoner’s names.
Date:
July 1, 2014
cc:
Plaintiffs, pro se
Warden, SCI Benner Township, 301 Institution Dr., Bellefonte, PA 16823
4412.009
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?