Estate of Dorothy Faye Lanham v. Springfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 10/10/2017: Defendant's Motion to Strike 66 and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 67 are both hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT. cc: Counsel (JBM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-00397-TBR
ESTATE OF DOROTHY FAYE LANHAM
SPRINGFIELD NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court upon two motions filed by Defendant Springfield
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (“Defendant”). First, Defendant has filed a Motion to Strike
Expert Witness Disclosure. [DN 66.] Second, Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary
Judgment. [DN 67.] These motions are the result of revelations that the expert whose testimony
Plaintiff had planned to rely on, Dr. Michael Langan, currently has a suspended medical license.
However, before the Court had occasion to rule on the above motions, Plaintiff notified the Court
and Defendant that Dr. Langan would no longer be relied upon as an expert, and Plaintiff has
since filed a new expert witness disclosure. Due to this fact, Defendant’s Motion to Strike [DN
66] and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 67] are both hereby DISMISSED AS
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Counsel of Record
October 10, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?