Basham v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations re 13 Motion to Stay. The defendant's motion to stay (Dkt. 13 ) is therefore GRANTED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. This case is stayed pending the Court's disposition of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on the defendant's motion to transfer. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/22/2015.(LBT) [Transferred from insd on 12/22/2015.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
NEW ALBANY DIVISION
DENISE BASHAM,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF )
AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
No. 4:15-cv-00078-TWP-DML
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY
On December 2, 2015, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. 24) on the defendant’s motion to stay. The parties were afforded the
opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that
Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 24) and being duly advised, now
APPROVES and ADOPTS it. The defendant’s motion to stay (Dkt. 13) is therefore GRANTED
as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. This case is stayed pending the
Court’s disposition of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on the defendant’s
motion to transfer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 12/22/2015
Distribution:
Andrew M. Grabhorn
GRABHORN LAW OFFICE PLLC
a.grabhorn@grabhornlaw.com
Michael D. Grabhorn
GRABHORN LAW OFFICE, PLLC
m.grabhorn@grabhornlaw.com
Samuel Schwartz-Fenwick
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
sschwartz-fenwick@seyfarth.com
Amanda A. Sonneborn
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP (Chicago)
asonneborn@seyfarth.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?