Basham v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations re 13 Motion to Stay. The defendant's motion to stay (Dkt. 13 ) is therefore GRANTED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. This case is stayed pending the Court's disposition of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on the defendant's motion to transfer. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/22/2015.(LBT) [Transferred from insd on 12/22/2015.]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION DENISE BASHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) No. 4:15-cv-00078-TWP-DML ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY On December 2, 2015, the Magistrate Judge submitted and filed her Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 24) on the defendant’s motion to stay. The parties were afforded the opportunity according to statute and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to file objections to that Report and Recommendation. No party has filed an objection. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 24) and being duly advised, now APPROVES and ADOPTS it. The defendant’s motion to stay (Dkt. 13) is therefore GRANTED as provided in the Report and Recommendation and this Order. This case is stayed pending the Court’s disposition of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on the defendant’s motion to transfer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 12/22/2015 Distribution: Andrew M. Grabhorn GRABHORN LAW OFFICE PLLC a.grabhorn@grabhornlaw.com Michael D. Grabhorn GRABHORN LAW OFFICE, PLLC m.grabhorn@grabhornlaw.com Samuel Schwartz-Fenwick SEYFARTH SHAW LLP sschwartz-fenwick@seyfarth.com Amanda A. Sonneborn SEYFARTH SHAW LLP (Chicago) asonneborn@seyfarth.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?