Goostree v. Hardin County Detention Center
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 10/7/2016; The 30-day period has expired without Plaintiff filing an amended complaint. Therefore, the action will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.cc:counsel, Pla., Hardin Cty Atty. (ARM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
LOUISVILLE DIVISION
TIMOTHY SHAWN GOOSTREE,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-P134-DJH
HARDIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendant.
* * * * *
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Timothy Shawn Goostree, a convicted prisoner at Hardin County Detention
Center (HCDC), filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (DN 1). By
Memorandum Opinion and Order entered August 15, 2016 (DN 7), the Court conducted an
initial review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismissed the claims against
the HCDC/Hardin County pursuant to § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted. The Court also provided Plaintiff 30 days within which to file an
amended complaint with respect to his denial-of-medication claim. The Court warned Plaintiff
that his failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted would result in dismissal of
the entire action for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order.
The 30-day period has expired without Plaintiff filing an amended complaint. Therefore,
the action will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted.
Date:
cc:
October 7, 2016
Plaintiff, pro se
Hardin County Attorney
4415.005
David J. Hale, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?