Watkins et al v. Hansford et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 9/18/2017. For the reasons set forth in the 37 , the Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the 33 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs' 14 Motion to Substitute a Party is DENIED. Plaintiffs' 18 Alternative Motion for Joinder is GRANTED. This action is REMANDED TO JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. cc: Counsel, JCC(RLK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE HUEL WATKINS and SUSAN WATKINS PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00069-CRS v. BRANDON HANSFORD, AUTOZONE STORES, INC. et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, the Court ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge in full. (ECF No. 33). The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Huel Watkins and Susan Watkins’ motion to substitute a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 (ECF No. 14) and GRANTS their alternative motion for joinder pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 (ECF No. 17). This action is REMANDED TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY, CIRCUIT COURT, DIVISION TWELVE (12), FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final order. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 18, 2017 C al R Smpo I , ei J d e h r s . i sn I Sno u g e I r U i dSae Ds i C ut nt tt ir t o r e s tc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?