Rodgers v. Southern Health Partners et al
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Greg N. Stivers on 8/14/2017. The 30-day period has expired, and the record reflects that the Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order. Therefore, the Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action. cc:Plaintiff, pro se (JWM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT LOUISVILLE
MATTHEW RODGERS
PLAINTIFF
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17CV-70-GNS
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS et al.
DEFENDANTS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Matthew Rodgers filed a pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (DN 1)
on February 3, 2017, while incarcerated at the Hardin County Detention Center. On May 11,
2017, Plaintiff notified the Court of a change of his address that indicates he is no longer
incarcerated. By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered June 5, 2017 (DN 9), the Court
conducted an initial review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and dismissed all of
the Defendants and the claims against them. However, the Court allowed Plaintiff 30 days to
amend his complaint to name the specific individuals responsible for allegedly denying Plaintiff
his prescribed medication. The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to file an amended
complaint within 30 days from entry of the Memorandum Opinion and Order would result in the
entry of a final Order dismissing the entire action for the reasons stated therein.
The 30-day period has expired, and the record reflects that Plaintiff has not filed an
amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order.
Therefore, the Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action.
Date:
August 14, 2017
cc:
Plaintiff, pro se
4416.003
Greg N. Stivers, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?