Martinez v. Bolton et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge David J. Hale on 11/30/2017 - The 90-day period for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint has expired. The Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action.cc: Plaintiff-pro se, Defendant Bolton, Jefferson County Attorney (DAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-P265-DJH
MARK BOLTON et al.,
* * * * *
Pro se Plaintiff Mauricio Martinez, a pretrial detainee at Louisville Metro Department of
Corrections (LMDC), initiated this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 27, 2017. The Court conducted an
initial review of this action on July 13, 2017 (DN 10). In the Memorandum Opinion and Order
entered on that date, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against the named Defendants for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, but allowed Plaintiff to move to amend
his complaint to name the unidentified individual officers who allegedly failed to protect him.
The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to file an amended complaint within 90 days from
entry of the Memorandum Opinion and Order, or to show cause for his failure to do so, would
result in the entry of a final Order dismissing the action for the reasons stated therein.
The 90-day period has expired, and the record reflects that Plaintiff has not taken any
action. Therefore, the Court will enter a separate Order dismissing this action.
November 30, 2017
Plaintiff, pro se
Jefferson County Attorney
David J. Hale, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?