Wheeler v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER Signed by Judge David J. Hale on 3/12/2019. The Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay (D.N. 21) are ADOPTED in full and INCORPORATED by reference herein. A separate judgment will be entered this date. cc: Counsel (MEJ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KELLY R. WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-503-DJH-CHL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. * * * * * ORDER Plaintiff Kelly R. Wheeler filed this action seeking review of the decision by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security to deny Wheeler’s application for disability insurance benefits. (Docket No. 1) The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay for report and recommendation. Judge Lindsay issued his Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation on February 21, 2019, recommending that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed and that Wheeler’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (D.N. 21) The time for objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation has now run, with no objections filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Because no party has objected to the report and recommendation, the Court may adopt it without review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Nevertheless, the Court has conducted its own review of the record and finds no error in the magistrate judge’s conclusions. Accordingly, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Colin H. Lindsay (D.N. 21) are ADOPTED in full and INCORPORATED by reference herein. (2) A separate judgment will be entered this date. March 12, 2019 David J. Hale, Judge United States District Court 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?