Ross v. Benningfield et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION by Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr on 3/16/10; A separate Order of dismissal will be entered consistent with this Memorandum Opinion.cc:counsel, Plaintiff (pro se), Defendants, TCA (JBM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT OWENSBORO CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:09CV-P113-M CHARLES DAVID ROSS v. RICK BENNINGFIELD et al. ORDER For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, and the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. There being no just reason for delay in its entry, this is a final Order. This Court further certifies that an appeal would be frivolous and, therefore, not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Date: March 16, 2010 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS cc: Plaintiff, pro se Defendants Taylor County Attorney 4414.010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?