Crowe v. Martin

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Simpson, III on 4/25/2016. For the reasons set forth in the 11 Memorandum Opinion, the 7 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation that habeas relief be denied and the 2241 petition be dismi ssed are ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. The recommendation that a Certificate of Appealability issue are REJECTED, and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion, a Certificate of Appealability will be DENIED. A separate judgment will be entered denying habeas corpus relief and dismissing the Petition with prejudice. cc: Crowe, pro se; Counsel(RLK)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT OWENSBORO

DAVID C. CROWE

PETITIONER

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:15-CV-122-CRS
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:95-CR-13-CRS

v.

STACEY MARTIN
U.S. Probation Officer

RESPONDENT

ORDER

This matter having come before the court for consideration of the Findings of Fact,
Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action
brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and objections filed thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the
memorandum opinion entered herein this date and the court being otherwise sufficiently advised,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of
Law, and Recommendation that habeas relief be denied and the § 2241 petition be dismissed are
ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. The magistrate judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,
and Recommendation that a Certificate of Appealability issue are REJECTED, and for the
reasons stated in the court’s Memorandum Opinion, a Certificate of Appealability will be

DENIED. A separate judgment will be entered denying habeas corpus relief and dismissing the
petition with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 25, 2016

C al R Smpo I , ei J d e
h r s . i sn I Sno u g
e
I
r
U i dSae Ds i C ut
nt tt ir t o r
e
s tc

cc:

Counsel of Record
David C. Crowe, pro se