Adams v. Jones et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 35 Motion for order amending payment of filing fee. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas B. Russell on 6/1/2011. cc:counsel (KJA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH TIMOTHY D. ROUSE, JR. v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10CV-P116-R JAY JONES et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for order amending payment of the filing fee (DN 35). He asks the Court to enter an order directing the Kentucky State Penitentiary to collect funds from his account each time the amount in the account exceeds $15.00, instead of $10.00. He claims that the amount of the filing fee and the manner in which it is collected are within the discretion of the Court. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, these determinations are not discretionary. Title 28 of the United States Code, Section 1915(b)(1) directs that a prisoner “shall be required to pay the full amount of the filing fee.” Further, § 1915(b)(2) sets the amount a prisoner must pay following payment of the initial filing fee: After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the prisoner’s account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid. In light of § 1915(b)’s mandates, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for order amending payment of the filing fee (DN 35) is DENIED. Date: cc: June 1, 2011 Plaintiff, pro se Counsel of record 4413.005

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?