Griffin v. Jones et al

Filing 212

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 9/18/2017 denying with leave to refile 190 Motion for Summary Judgment. Telephone Conference set for 9/19/2017 at 11:00 AM before Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell. Counsel must call 1-877-848-7030 then give the Access Code 2523122 and #, then when prompted press # again to join the call. cc: Counsel(KJA)

Download PDF
et al. see also see also See See See see also see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. Laster v. City of Kalamazoo Logan v. Denny’s, Inc. Ahlers v. Schebil Back v. Nestlé USA, Inc. Anderson see also Laster Celotex Corp. v. Catrett Laster Celotex Corp. See See See Baker Hughes Inc. v. S&S Chem., LLC Howe v. City of Akron Id. see also Federal Practice and Procedure Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. v. Seaway Marine Transp. Vance ex rel. Hammons v. United States Howe Russell v. Absolute Collection Servs., Inc. see also Abrams v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc. Bentley v. Highlands Hosp. Corp. Howe see, e.g. See See Smith v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. Boegh v. United States See Pacheco v. Johnson Id. Id. See Redmond Compare Smith Bentley Etheridge v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. Redmond City of Memphis EQT Prod. Co. v. Magnum Hunter Prod., Inc. and Askew v. with Cleveland v. Policy Mgmt. Sys. Corp. accord Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. White v. Baptist Mem’l Health Care Corp. Aeral, S.R.L. v. PCC Airfoils, L.L.C. France v. Lucas Aeral Aeral Franks v. Nimmo Baer v. Chase Baer See Loadman Grp. v. Banco Popular N. Am. Reid Smith v. Consol. Rail Corp. see also McClain v. Mason Co. Aeral Id Aeral Id. A telephonic status conference is set on 9/19/2017 at 11:00 a.m. Central Time. Counsel must call 1-877-848-7030 then give the Access Code 2523122 and #, then when prompted press # again to join the call. IT IS SO ORDERED. cc: Counsel September 18, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?