Odom v. Losser et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell on 4/18/2013; an appropriate order shall issuecc:counsel (KJA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH GLENN D. ODOM, II PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12CV-P173-R HEATHER LOSSER et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Glenn D. Odom, II’s pro se motion to voluntarily dismiss this action (DN 6). Under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). No answer or motion for summary judgment having been filed by Defendants, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (DN 6) is GRANTED. The Court will dismiss this action by separate Order. Dismissal of this action, however, does not relieve Plaintiff of his responsibility to pay the entire filing fee. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), the obligation to pay the filing fee attaches when a prisoner “brings a civil action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (“[I]f a prisoner brings a civil action . . . in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.”). “[T]he subsequent dismissal of the action, even if voluntary, does not negate that obligation.” In re Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 381 (6th Cir. 2002) (citing McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607 (6th Cir. 1997)). Accordingly, the Court’s prior Order entered November 20, 2012 (DN 5), requiring Plaintiff to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments, shall remain in full force and effect. Date: April 18, 2013 cc: Plaintiff, pro se General Counsel, Justice & Public Safety Cabinet, Office of Legal Counsel 4413.005 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?