Shoults v. White

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM OPINION by Senior Judge Thomas B. Russell that because Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint, all claims will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. cc: Plaintiff, pro se (SG)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AT PADUCAH
ADAM B. SHOULTS

PLAINTIFF

v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-P77-TBR

RANDY WHITE

DEFENDANT
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Adam B. Shoults, an inmate incarcerated at the Kentucky State Penitentiary,
filed a pro se, in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Memorandum
Opinion and Order entered June 19, 2015 (DN 8), the Court conducted an initial review of the
complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and granted Plaintiff 30 days within which to file an
amended complaint which stated a claim entitling him to relief under § 1983. The Court warned
Plaintiff that his failure to file an amended complaint within the time allotted would result in
dismissal of the entire action with prejudice.
The 30-day period has expired without the filing of an amended complaint by Plaintiff.
Accordingly, all claims will be dismissed by separate Order for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
Date:

July 29, 2015

cc:
Plaintiff, pro se
4413.009