Moore et al v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board et al
Filing
1549
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 1548 Court Compliance Officer's (CCO) recommended framework is ADOPTED, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/22/2018.(jls)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
M.C. MOORE, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 65-15556
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL.
SECTION "B"(1)
ORDER AND REASONS
Considering the “Court Compliance Officer’s Recommendation
for a Framework for use of Interim Staff Appointments” (Rec. Doc.
1548), and the fact that no objections have been filed,1
IT IS ORDERED that the Court Compliance Officer’s (CCO)
recommended framework (Rec. Doc. 1548) is ADOPTED. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 53(f). As envisioned by the Court’s Order and Reasons that
instructed the CCO to develop a framework for the use of interim
appointments,
see
Rec.
Doc.
1544
at
1,
14-19,
the
proposed
framework balances the Board’s practical need to adequately staff
its schools, sometimes on short notice, with the remedial purposes
of the staff hiring order (Rec. Doc. 866). The framework allows
interim appointments that are limited in duration, see Rec. Doc.
1548 at 3, ensures that the Board will provide notice when making
an interim appointment, see id. at 3-4, and provides for prompt
review by the CCO of any proposed interim appointments, see id.
at 4. Importantly, the framework also makes clear that interim
1
“Any objections to the recommended framework [were] due no later
than ten (10) days after” August 6, 2018. Rec. Doc. 1544 at 1.
1
appointments
are
not
a
substitute
for,
nor
may
they
delay,
permanent hiring in compliance with the staff hiring order (Rec.
Doc. 866). See Rec. Doc. 1548 at 3, 4.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 22nd day of August, 2018.
___________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?