Moore et al v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board et al
Filing
1694
ORDER & REASONS re 1690 Motion in Response to CCO Report: IT IS ORDERED that the CCO shall convene a meeting within thirty (30) days of this Order with counsel, representatives of TPSB, including the Superintendent and other members of the mana gement team that the Superintendent believes appropriate to attend, the Chief Equity Officer, as well as any other person(s) whom the CCO believes appropriate to include in the meeting. The purpose of the meeting shall be to consider and select a court appointed independent expert, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 6/7/2022.(pp)
Case 2:65-cv-15556-ILRL-JVM Document 1694 Filed 06/07/22 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JOYCE MARIE MOORE, ET AL
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 65-15556
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
SECTION: “B”(1)
ORDER & REASONS
The Court Compliance Officer’s 2021 report (Rec. Doc.1668) offers multiple observations
and several recommendations. In response, Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a Motion in Response to the
CCO Report (Rec. Doc. 1690), Plaintiffs express general concerns regarding staff and
administrator hiring, use of funds from increased sales tax revenues attributable to TPSB, and the
complaint process as modified by Rec. Doc. 1661. Defendant filed a response (Rec. Doc. 1693),
in which TPSB contends that it is in substantial compliance with Rec. Doc. 1661.
The recent CCO report offers a thorough summary of the status of the case and progress
TPSB has made in its efforts to desegregate schools following the modifications set out at Rec.
Doc. 1661.
The CCO made a specific recommendation regarding the complaint process
TPSB has undertaken.
He also references this court’s consideration whether to appoint an
independent expert to evaluate TPSB schools that have and continue to receive failing or near
failing grades, specifically “F” and “D” grades and best approaches to rectify those issues. The
failing schools, and many of those that are near failing, are predominately African-American
schools.
Such an expert could propose viable solutions for placing those schools upon a
track for success.
In addition, the CCO report offers insights on concerns and challenges
regarding TPSB’s “magnet” programs, which interrelate with the overall success of the TPSB
1
Case 2:65-cv-15556-ILRL-JVM Document 1694 Filed 06/07/22 Page 2 of 4
schools. The CCO report also suggests that a court appointed expert should take the magnet
school and other issues into consideration.
The court has previously made several suggestions of well-qualified experts for the parties
to consider and provided the parties information on the qualifications and background of those
experts. The court provided TPSB full opportunity to address the issues posed by the failing and
near failing schools, and it intends to allow TPSB to make needed corrections and improvements.
However, the court finds that an independent expert is needed and would greatly aide the parties
in TPSB’s ongoing efforts to desegregate its schools.
The court acknowledges and commends all of the many good faith efforts of parents,
guardians, teachers, staff, students, administrators, board members, parties, counsel of record, as
well as local, parish, and state leaders to improve TPSB’s school system. TPSB continues to make
progress in various areas, despite significant challenges, including horrific weather-related losses,
an on-going pandemic, and departures of two leading TPSB educators to state-wide
assistant superintendent positions at the Louisiana Department of Education. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The CCO shall convene a meeting within thirty (30) days of this Order with
counsel, representatives of TPSB, including the Superintendent and other members of the
management team that the Superintendent believes appropriate to attend, the Chief Equity
Officer, as well as any other person(s) whom the CCO believes appropriate to include in
the meeting. The purpose of the meeting shall be to consider and select a court
appointed independent expert. The scope of the court appointed expert’s role shall be
to consider the facts, circumstances and other relevant matters and issues regarding
TPSB failing and near failing schools, the efficacy of the “magnet” program, including
2
Case 2:65-cv-15556-ILRL-JVM Document 1694 Filed 06/07/22 Page 3 of 4
changes recently proposed and to be effected by TPSB, and teacher and student
assignment, as appropriate.
The court appointed expert will perform those
services with consideration of findings and recommendations from School Leadership
Center of New Orleans (“SLC”), its data collector ATTUNED, Discipline
Revolution Project (“DRP”), the TPSS, and other sources deemed relevant by the
expert. No later than forty-five (45) days of this Order, the CCO shall provide to
the court a recommendation for a court appointed expert.
2. TPSB shall maintain a record of all complaints asserted in its Moore complaint process
as set forth in Rec. Doc. 1661 (including the portions of Rec. Doc. 1615-1) that were
adopted by entry of Rec. Doc. 1661, to include the following:
a. Name of the complainant, and if a complaint is asserted on behalf of another
person, the identity of that person;
b. Date the complaint was asserted;
c. Nature and summary of the complaint;
d. Who followed up with the complainant and when;
e. TPSB’s determination regarding the complaint, and confirmation that the
determination was effectively communicated to the complainant;
f. When TPSB rejects a complaint, or otherwise decides that it lacks merit, in
whole or part, TPSB should verify that the complaint was provided with a clear
and concise explanation of the review or appeal process, including any time
constraints;
g. Whether an appeal or review was sought;
h. In the event of an appeal or request for review, a discussion of the process and
the appeal and result, if there is one;
i. Current status of complaints; and
j. For each school year, on a quarterly basis TPSB report a cumulative listing of
all school level or “local” complaints, and the current status of the information
required above, to Class Counsel, the CEO and CCO.
3
Case 2:65-cv-15556-ILRL-JVM Document 1694 Filed 06/07/22 Page 4 of 4
The CCO, TPSB, the Chief Equity Officer, and counsel are directed to meet and confer
on the details of the reporting, including implementation of a process that is
meaningfully representative of selected communications, but not over-inclusive
of day-to-day communications with parents, guardians, teachers, staff, other TPSB
employees, and others that would create unnecessary work and effort at the school
level, and for employment matters, the Human Resources Department.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 7th day of June, 2022
___________________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?