Bencomo v. Guidant Corporation

Filing 85

ORDER denying 80 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; granting 81 Motion to Expedite; denying Doc. 82 Request for Oral Argument. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 10/23/2008. (mmm, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RAUL R. BENCOMO VERSUS GUIDANT CORPORATION, ET AL. ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order and Motion for Review (Rec. Doc. 80). As a CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-2473 SECTION: "J" (1) preliminary matter, Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Expedited Hearing (Rec. Doc. 81) and has requested oral argument. The motion to expedite hearing is granted. However, oral argument is canceled as the Court does not find it to be necessary. Therefore this motion, which is opposed, is being Upon review of considered on the briefs on an expedited basis. the record, the memoranda of counsel, and the applicable law, this Court now finds that Plaintiff's objection and motion for review should be denied. A magistrate judge's ruling on a nondispositive motion may be appealed to the district court. Fed R. Civ. P. 72(a). When objections are raised to such a motion the district judge must consider them timely and "modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Under this standard a magistrate judge's decision must be affirmed unless "on the entire evidence [the court] is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948). After reviewing the case, the magistrate judge's order and the arguments of the parties the Court finds that no such mistake has been made in the magistrate judge's Order (Rec. Doc. 79). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order and Motion for Review (Rec. Doc. 80) is hereby DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 23rd day of October, 2008. _____________________________ CARL J. BARBIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?