Aunt Sally's Praline Shop, Inc. v. United Fire & Casualty Company

Filing 84

ORDER AND OPINION denying 76 Second MOTION to Continue Trial filed by United Fire & Casualty Company. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 9/16/08.(blg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA AUNT SALLY'S PRALINE SHOP, INC. VERSUS UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY ORDER AND OPINION Before the Court is the motion to continue the trial presently scheduled for September 29, 2008, filed on behalf of defendant United Fire & Casualty Company ("United Fire")(Doc. 76). Defendant seeks to continue the September 29, 2008, trial contending that Allen Schons, the regional claims manager for United Fire Group, will be unavailable for the because he will be recovering from open-heart surgery to be performed on September 16, 2008. Having reviewed the pleadings, memoranda, deposition of Mr. Schons, and relevant law, the Court, for the reasons assigned, DENIES the motion. Mr. Schons appeared as a representative of United Fire at a 30(B)(6) deposition taken on June 9, 2008. Prior to beginning the deposition, counsel stipulated that the deposition was being taken "for discovery and all other purposes."(Doc. 81, p. 3). The Court has reviewed the deposition. It appears based on the witnesses involvement in this matter that Mr. Schons is not an essential witness. When Mr. Schons was asked on cross examination by counsel for United Fire what his role was at the deposition, Mr. Schons responded "[i]t was just to respond to a couple of questions that Leni had sent over and she asked my advice." Doc. 81, p. 57. By his own statement Mr. Schons is not an essential witness whose presence is necessary at trial. Defendant has failed to demonstrate good cause for the requested continuance. Accordingly, the Court denies the motion to continue the trial. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 16th day of September, 2008. STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-7674 SECTION "K"(5)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?