Kreger v. General Steel Corporation et al

Filing 618

ORDER & REASONS re: 575 Motion for Reconsideration. ORDERED that Colorado Casualty's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Oral argument on the motion is CANCELLED. Signed by Judge Helen G. Berrigan on 11/16/09. (plh, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RONALD KREGER, SR., VERSUS GENERAL STEEL CORPORATION, GREGG LANIER HOWELL, WORLDWIDE CONCRETE AND STEEL ERECTIONS, L.L.C. CIVIL ACTION NO: 07-575 SECTION: "C" (1) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Colorado Casualty's Motion to Reconsider the denial of its Motion for Summary Judgment. (Rec. Doc. 575). Colorado Casualty's motion repeats the arguments from the original motions. The only new argument is that Revised Second Amended Complaint (Rec. Doc. 473), which was not "in effect" at the time the last motion was briefed, dropped the specific claims for negligence. However, the Revised Second Amended Complaint includes several factual allegations that sound in negligence. In Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 74 P.3d 294 (Colo. 2003), the Colorado Supreme Court made clear that the duty to defend applies when "the facts or claims alleged may arguably fall within the policy. Id. at 299. Indeed, in a later paragraph the court itself emphasized that if "any facts or claims . . . might fall within the ambit of the policy, the insurer must tender a defense." Id. at 301 (emphasis in original). Colorado Casualty also assumes that lack of sleep is not a bodily injury. Sleep deprivation is arguably physical, and based on the case law set out in the previous Order and Reasons (Rec. Doc. 568), it is a close enough call to trigger the duty to defend. 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Colorado Casualty's motion for reconsideration (Rec. Doc. 575) is DENIED. Oral argument on the motion, currently scheduled for November 18, 2009, is CANCELLED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 16th day of November, 2009. ____________________________________ HELEN G. BERRIGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?