Nguyen et al v. Lexington Insurance Company

Filing 17

ORDER and REASONS - Before the Court is a Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Statutory Penalties 8 , filed by the plaintiffs, Thu My Nguyen and Viet Trung Tran, on December 19, 2008. Defendant, Lexington Insurance Company, opposes the motion. Considering the memoranda filed by the parties and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as stated herein. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/11/09. (cab) Modified on 3/11/2009 to edit document type (cab).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THU MY NGUYEN and VIET TRUNG TRAN VERSUS LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-8814 SECTION "N" (5) **************************************************** ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Statutory Penalties (Rec. Doc. 8), filed by the plaintiffs, Thu My Nguyen and Viet Trung Tran, on December 19, 2008. Defendant, Lexington Insurance Company, opposes the motion. Considering the memoranda filed by the parties and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. On October 18, 2008, the parties in this action reached a settlement agreement. (Rec. Doc. 8-3, exh. 1). On November 3, 2008, Lexington was provided with the proper payee information that was necessary for the defendant to prepare and tender the settlement payments to the plaintiffs. (Rec. Doc. 10-2, exh. 3). Subsequently, Lexington sent payment through certified mail on November 20, 2008. (Rec. Doc. 10-2, exh. 4). The plaintiffs thereafter filed the pending motion 1 with this Court, asserting a claim for statutory penalties pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. 22:1220(C),1 on the allegation that Lexington was late on its payment. Under Louisiana law, an insurer has a duty to pay settlement funds to the insured within thirty days after this agreement is reduced to writing. La. Rev. Stat. 22:1973(B)(2) (formerly La. Rev. Stat. 22:1220(B)(2)). This thirty day period commences when "the last necessary prerequisite to payment is accomplished". Guilbeau v. Ramsay, 2003-1402, 870 So.2d 565, 569 (La. App. 3 Cir. 04/07/2004). Here, Lexington could not make a payment on the settlement without first knowing who the proper payee was on the claim. Therefore, obtaining this information was a "necessary prerequisite" before payment could be made. Id. Because the payment was made within thirty days of obtaining this information, the statutory penalties will not be awarded. Thus, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Statutory Penalties is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 11th day of March, 2009. ______________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Effective January 1, 2009, this statute is now cited as La. Rev. Stat. 22:1973. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?