In Re: Jillian Morrison, LLC, et al
Filing
571
ORDER denying 458 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/22/09. (Reference: 08-1255)(sek, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
IN RE: JILLIAN MORRISON, LLC, et al
CIVIL ACTION
NO:08-1255 SECTION: "J" (5)
ORDER Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order (Rec. D. 458). Defendants seek a protective order on several grounds. Firstly, Defendants allege that Plaintiffs' requests are unduly burdensome and harassing. Further, Defendants allege that Plaintiffs do not have a right to request discovery relevant only to claims of punitive damages under the Jones Act. Defendants argue that punitive damages are not available to Plaintiffs. However, the law on this issue remains unsettled. Recently,
Judge Berrigan ruled that "[i]n light of the movement of the law in this area" the Court would add the damages1 as "a separate part of the damages sought in this case...[to]...avoid retrial in the event the law changes." In re Md. Marine, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58957 *17 (E.D. La. July 9, 2009).
In In re Md. Marine Ltd. the Court was addressing the availability of loss of society damages. Loss of society and punitive damages are similarly situated with respect to uncertainty in the law.
1
The Court finds this reasoning compelling. The Court further finds that Plaintiffs' requests are reasonable considering the size and scope of this litigation. Accordingly, It IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order (Rec. D. 458) is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this the 22nd day of September 2009.
____________________________ CARL J. BARBIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?