Public Citizen, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board et al

Filing 16

Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Public Citizen, Inc., Morris Bart, Morris Bart L.L.C., William N Gee, III, William N. Gee, III, Ltd. regarding 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Ciolino, Dane)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA | | | CIV. ACTION NO. 08-4451 Plaintiffs, | | SEC. F (JUDGE FELDMAN) v. | | MAG. 2 (MAG. JUDGE WILKINSON) LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY | BOARD, et al.; | | Defendants. _______________________________________ | PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., et al., REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT Plaintiffs respectfully request oral argument on their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Oral argument is warranted because the case raises important questions of commercial free speech with the potential to affect the First Amendment rights of all lawyers and consumers in Louisiana. Plaintiffs believe oral argument would benefit the Court and would help clarify application of the numerous relevant commercial speech precedents to the various rules challenged here. -1- Dated: Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________ Dane S. Ciolino, T.A., La. Bar No. 19,311 DANE S. CIOLINO, LLC P.O. Box 850848 New Orleans, LA 70185-0848 Phone: (504) 834-8519 Fax: (504) 324-0143 Email: dciolino@loyno.edu Counsel for Plaintiffs Public Citizen, Inc., William N. Gee, III, and William N. Gee, III, Ltd. Terry B. Loup, La. Bar No. 8823 MORRIS BART, L.L.C. 20th Floor 909 Poydras Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 Phone: (504) 599-3254 Fax: (504) 599-3380 Email: tloup@morrisbart.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Morris Bart and Morris Bart, L.L.C. Gregory A. Beck DC Bar No. 494479, pro hac vice pending Brian Wolfman DC Bar No. 427491, pro hac vice pending PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP 1600 20th St., NW Washington, DC 20009 Phone: (202) 588-1000 Fax: (202) 588-7795 Email: gbeck@citizen.org brian@citizen.org Counsel for All Plaintiffs -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?