In Re: Apple iPhone 3G and 3GS MMS Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation

Filing 193

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Carl Barbier: Status Conference held on 11/3/2010. During the conference, the parties agreed to stay the portion of the case that relates to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant AT&T in light of the case pending before the United States Supreme Court, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The parties will prepare a revised scheduling order and submit it to the Court by Friday, November 5, 2010. This new scheduling order will not affect the current scheduling order with respect to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Apple. (Reference: all cases)(sek, )

Download PDF
In Re: Apple iPhone 3G and 3GS MMS Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Doc. 193 MINUTE ENTRY BARBIER, J. November 3, 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA : MDL NO. 2116 : : SECTION: J : : JUDGE BARBIER This minute entry applies to all cases. : MAG. JUDGE WILKINSON .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. IN RE: APPLE iPHONE 3G AND 3GS "MMS" MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION The Court held a status conference with the following counsel in attendance by telephone: Scott Bickford and Brian Strange for Plaintiffs; and Archis Parasharami, Gary Russo, and Kathleen Sooy for Defendant AT&T. During the conference, the parties agreed to stay the portion of the case that relates to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant AT&T in light of the case pending before the United States Supreme Court, AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The parties will prepare a revised scheduling order and submit it to the Court by Friday, November 5, 2010. This new scheduling order will not affect the current scheduling order with respect to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Apple. **************** JS-10: 9 mins. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?