Southern United States Trade Association v. John Doe 1 et al
Filing
186
ORDERED that defendant Summit Guddh's Motion for Leave to File Motion to AllowElectronic Filing by a Party Appearing without an Attorney and Supporting Information 181 be and is hereby GRANTED and that said Motion be entered into the record in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh's Motion for Expedited Hearing 182 on the above Motion be and is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh's Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's Ruling and Motion to Assign New Magistrate Judge 183 be and is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh's Motion for Expedited Hearing 184 on the above Motion be and is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 11/14/12. (dno, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SOUTHERN UNITED STATES TRADE ASSOCIATION
VERSUS
UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES
*
*
*
*
*
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-1669
SECTION “L” (4)
ORDER
Before the Court are several Motions filed by pro se defendant Sumit Guddh. The Court
has reviewed the submissions and applicable law and now issues the following Order.
IT IS ORDERED that Sumit Guddh’s Motion for Leave to File Motion to Allow
Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing without an Attorney and Supporting Information (R. Doc.
181) be and is hereby GRANTED and that said Motion be entered into the record in this matter.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh’s Motion for Expedited Hearing (R. Doc. 182) on the
above Motion be and is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh’s Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate
Judge’s Ruling and Motion to Assign New Magistrate Judge (R. Doc. 183) be and is hereby
DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Guddh’s Motion for Expedited Hearing (R. Doc.
184) on the above Motion be and is hereby GRANTED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 14th day of November, 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?