Baumgartner-Jackson et al v. New Orleans City et al
Filing
44
ORDER and REASONS denying 42 Motion for New Trial as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 4/10/2012. (cab)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
OLIVERA BAUMGARTNER-JACKSON
AND ALVIN JACKSON
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 10-3228
THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL.
SECTION “N” (3)
ORDER AND REASONS
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion for a New Trial” (Rec. Doc. 42)
regarding the Court’s prior Order and Reasons (Rec. Doc. 38). For essentially the reasons stated
in Defendants’ opposition memorandum (Rec. Doc. 43) regarding the limited applicability of Rule
59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction over
Plaintiffs’ claims, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of April 2012.
_________________________________
KURT D. ENGELHARDT
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
