Bennett v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 . Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon.(ecm, )

Download PDF
Bennett v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TROY ALLEN BENNETT VERSUS RAYBURN CORRECTION CENTER WARDEN ROBERT TANNER, ET AL. ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby finds that plaintiff did not state a claim actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Section 1983 affords a remedy only for violations of "rights, privileges, or immunities" secured by the Constitution and the laws of the United States. Plaintiff claims involve accidental damage to his partial plate, which is not a violation of his "rights, privileges, or immunities" secured by the Constitution or the laws of the Untied States. Further, to the extent that plaintiff asserts a tort claim under Louisiana law, the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) ("The district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim . . . if . . . the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction."). IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's federal civil rights claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3295 SECTION "S"(1) Dockets.Justia.com Hello This is a Test December 21st New Orleans, Louisiana, this ______ day of __________________, 2010. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?