Phillips and Jordan, Inc. et al v. Coffey et al

Filing 69

ORDER and REASONS finding as moot 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 4/9/2012. (cab) Modified on 4/9/2012 to edit linkage (cab).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PHILLIPS & JORDAN INCORPORATED, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-1922 PATRICK COFFEY, ET AL SECTION "N" (3) ORDER AND REASONS Given the filing of the Plaintiffs’ “First Amended and Supplemental Complaint” (Rec. Doc. 60), and the movants’ filing of an associated motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc. 62), IT IS ORDERED that the previous motion to dismiss filed by Defendants’ Patrick Coffey and Southern State Recovery, Inc., regarding the original complaint, is MOOT.1 New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of April 2012. ___________________________________ KURT D. ENGLEHART United States District Judge 1 The status of the previous motion to dismiss was confirmed, via electronic mail, by movants’ counsel on April 2, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?