Bayou Inspection Services, Inc. v. Orion Construction LP

Filing 63

ORDER and REASONS denying 27 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, as stated within docuemnt. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/3/2013. (cab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BAYOU INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-2643 ORION CONSTRUCTION LP SECTION “N” (3) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Defendant in Counterclaim, First Mercury Insurance Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 27), seeking to dismiss claims for bad faith penalties and attorney fees brought against First Mercury by counterclaimant Orion Construction LP (“Orion”). Having considered First Mercury’s motion and the memorandum and materials submitted in support thereof (Rec. Doc. 27 and attachments), Orion’s opposition memorandum and materials submitted therewith (Rec. Doc. 32 and attachments), First Mercury’s reply memorandum (Rec. Doc. 37), Orion’s sur-reply memorandum (Rec. Doc. 41), First Mercury’s response to the sur-reply (Rec. Doc. 48), and the applicable law, the Court finds that Orion has shown that a genuine dispute exists as to whether First Mercury has received satisfactory proof of all or part of the claimed loss and if so, when such receipt occurred; whether the loss is covered under the Professional Liability part of the Policy; whether First Mercury has a reasonable basis for its continued failure to pay all or part of the loss pursuant to the Professional Liability part of the Policy; and whether First Mercury has misrepresented its Policy provisions, particularly those which it claims exclude coverage under the Professional Liability part of the Policy. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that First Mercury’s motion for partial summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 27) is hereby DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 3rd day of January, 2013. ____________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?