Sands et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 10

ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/16/12. (mmv, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARTHA SANDS AND JACK SANDS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 11-2884 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. SECTION B(5) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. No. 5). Local Rule 7.5 of the Eastern District of Louisiana as amended and effective February 1, 2011 requires that memoranda in opposition with citations of authorities be filed and served no later than eight days before the noticed submission date. No memoranda in opposition to the motion, set for submission on March 7, 2012, has been submitted. Further, no one has filed a motion to continue the noticed submission date or filed a motion for extension of time within which to oppose the motion. Accordingly, the motion is deemed to be unopposed, and, further, it appearing to the Court that the motion has merit, IT IS ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED. A motion for reconsideration of this order based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, if any, must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order. accompanied by opposition memoranda to The motion must be the original motions. Because such a motion would not have been necessary had timely opposition memoranda been filed, the costs incurred in connection with the motion, including attorney's fees, will be assessed against the party moving for reconsideration. 16, 83. See Fed. R. Civ. P. A statement of costs conforming to Local Rule 54.3 shall be submitted by all parties desiring to be awarded costs and attorney's fees no later than eight (8) days prior to the noticed submission date of the motion for reconsideration. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 16TH day of March, 2012. ______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?