Stinson v. Edwards et al

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 - the plaintiffs motion to compel discovery is DISMISSED as moot. It is further ordered that plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims of excessive force, failure to protect, and denial of medica l care arising from the February 6, 2012, incident against Warden Jackson, Assistant Warden Pinion, Deputy Jackson, Deputy Andrews, Sergeant Ricard, and Deputy Connerson are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/18/13.(jjs, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RYAN JOEL EDWARD STINSON

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO: 12-404

DANIEL EDWARDS, ET AL.

SECTION: R(4)

ORDER
The Court, finding that as of this date neither party has
filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation,1 hereby approves the Report and Recommendation
and adopts it as its opinion.
Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery2 is
DISMISSED as moot.
It is further ordered that plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983
claims of excessive force, failure to protect, and denial of
medical care arising from the February 6, 2012, incident against
Warden Jackson, Assistant Warden Pinion, Deputy Jackson, Deputy
Andrews, Sergeant Ricard, and Deputy Connerson are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b).

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 18th day of July, 2013.
__
_________________________________
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

R. Doc. 49.

2

R. Doc. 40.