Sharp v. Schindler Elevator Corporation et al
Filing
50
ORDER and REASONS that Hertz 909 Poydras, L.L.C. file a list of its members,indicating the state(s) of which they are citizens, into the record of this case by April 5, 2013. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 4/1/2013.(cms, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MARY SHARP
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 12-705
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP., ET
AL.
SECTION: "S" (5)
ORDER AND REASONS
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hertz 909 Poydras, L.L.C. file a list of its members,
indicating the state(s) of which they are citizens, into the record of this case by April 5, 2013.
Plaintiff, Mary Sharp, filed this action against Schindler Elevator Corporation in the Civil
District Court, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana alleging that she was injured by a malfunction
of an elevator in the high-rise office building located at 909 Poydras Street, New Oleans, Louisiana.
Schindler removed the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
alleging that the court had diversity subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. After
removal, Sharp added Hertz 909 Poydras, L.L.C. as a defendant.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, a federal district court has original subject matter jurisdiction
over matters in which there is complete diversity between the plaintiffs and the defendants, and the
amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. The citizenship of a limited liability company is
determined by the citizenship of all of its members. Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d
1077, 1080 (5th Cir. 2008). Therefore, this court must be informed of the citizenship of Hertz 909
Poydras, L.L.C.'s members to determine if there is complete diversity between the plaintiff and
defendants.
1st
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of April, 2013.
____________________________________
MARY ANN VIAL LEMMON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?