Prejean v. O'Brien's Response Management, Inc.
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 26 ; ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to certify a collective class 19 is GRANTED IN PART & that a collective class is conditionally certified, consisting of all workers who: (a) worked for OBrien 's Response Management, Inc. at any site on the BP Deepwater Horizon MC252 oil spill response between April 21, 2010 & January 1, 2011; (b) were classified as independent contractors; (c) paid a day-rate; (d) worked over forty hours in at leas t one workweek without receiving overtime pay; & (e) performed duties tracking oil spill response personnel &/or equipment, &/or assisted in managing &/or tracking the resources used in the response. FURTHER ORDERED that parties must meet & confe r within 30 days after entry of this order & attempt to reach an agreed upon notice & consent form. FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that parties can agree upon forms of notice & consent, they must submit their proposed forms to the Court via a joint letter no later than 30 days after the conditional certification order. FURTHER ORDERED that, by the same date, parties may file supplemental memoranda regarding any portions of the notice & the proposed deadlines as to which they have not agreed. The Court will thereafter enter an order regarding the form of notice. FURTHER ORDERED that defendant must produce to plaintiff, within 30 days after entry of this order, a computer-readable data file containing all potential opt-in plaintiffs' names and last known mailing & e-mail addresses. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/6/13.(Reference: 12-1045)(sek, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DENNIS PREJEAN ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 12-1045
c/w 12-1716, 12-1533
O’BRIEN’S RESPONSE
MANAGEMENT, INC.
This document applies to No. 12-1045
SECTION “J”(2)
ORDER
The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 26), the objection by O’Brien’s Response
Management L.L.C. (Rec. Doc. 40), plaintiffs’ response (Rec. Doc. 50), the record, and
the applicable law, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to certify a collective class is
GRANTED IN PART and that a collective class is conditionally certified, consisting of
all workers who:
(a) worked for O’Brien’s Response Management, Inc. at any site on the BP
Deepwater Horizon MC252 oil spill response between April 21, 2010 and
January 1, 2011;
(b) were classified as independent contractors;
(c) paid a day-rate;
(d) worked over forty hours in at least one workweek without receiving
overtime pay; and
(e) performed duties tracking oil spill response personnel and/or equipment,
and/or assisted in managing and/or tracking the resources used in the
response.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer within 30
days after entry of this order and attempt to reach an agreed upon notice and consent
form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that the parties can agree upon
forms of notice and consent, they must submit their proposed forms to the Court via a
joint letter no later than 30 days after the conditional certification order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by the same date, the parties may file
supplemental memoranda regarding any portions of the notice and the proposed
deadlines as to which they have not agreed. The Court will thereafter enter an order
regarding the form of notice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant must produce to plaintiff, within
30 days after entry of this order, a computer-readable data file containing all potential
opt-in plaintiffs’ names and last known mailing and e-mail addresses.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of November, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?