Alexander v. Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc.
Filing
27
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court is the "Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and, Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment" 8 filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., d/b/a CCMSI, Inc. For essen tially all of the same reasons set forth in Defendant's supporting memoranda (Rec. Docs. 8-1 and 20), IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 12/14/2012. (cab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DWAYNE ALEXANDER
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 12-1524
CANNON COCHRAN MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CCMSI, Inc.
SECTION “N” (1)
ORDER AND REASONS
Presently before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and,
Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment” (Rec. Doc. 8) filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran
Management Services, Inc., d/b/a CCMSI, Inc. For essentially all of the same reasons set forth in
Defendant’s supporting memoranda (Rec. Docs. 8-1 and 20), IT IS ORDERED that the motion is
GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Also presently before the Court is the “Motion for Sanctions and for Pre-Filing
Injunction” (Rec. Doc. 9) filed by Defendant Cannon Cochran Management Services, Inc., d/b/a
CCMSI, Inc. Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, as well as the records in each
of the proceedings referenced in Defendant’s motion, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff, Dwayne
Alexander, and Worldwide Detective Agency, Inc., shall not hereafter file in this Court, directly or
indirectly, any additional complaints, motions, or other pleading that arises from or is premised upon
the termination of Alexander’s and/or Worldwide’s private investigative services provided to the
City of New Orleans and/or Defendant CCMSI, without first seeking leave of Court to do so, and
certifying, in writing, that the proposed submission is not frivolous, presented for an improper
purpose, repetitive, or duplicative, has evidentiary support, and does not contain any inappropriate,
irrelevant, malicious, harassing and/or insulting comments. Failure to comply with this order may
result in filings being stricken from the record and/or the imposition of significant financial and/or
other sanctions, including payment of excess costs, expenses, and any attorney’s fees under 28
U.S.C. §1927 and/or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.
Plaintiff is further advised that the Court takes complaints of witness tampering and
any efforts to influence potential jurors, interfere with the administration of justice, and a party’s
right to a fair trial very seriously. Such conduct will not be tolerated and may result in the
imposition of substantial sanctions.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 14th day of December 2012.
___________________________________
Kurt D. Engelhardt
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?