Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. C&G Construction of Louisiana, Inc.
ORDER AND REASONS denying 103 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval, Jr on 7/23/2014. (Reference: 13-5336)(my)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ARCH SPECIALTY INS. CO.
a/s/o 2633 NAPOLEON
C/W NO. 13-5336
C/W NO. 13-6117
C&G CONSTRUCTION ON
PERTAINS TO 13-5336
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Houston Specialty
Insurance Company ("HSIC") (Doc. 103) whereby it seeks a judgment declaring that R.C.I.S.,
Inc. ("RCIS") is not an insured under the HSIC commercial general liability policy ("CGL
policy") issued to C&G Construction of Louisiana, Inc. ("C&G"). It contends there is no
coverage provided because: (1) RCIS is not an employee, agent, project manager or
representative of C&G; and (2) RCIS is not an additional insured under the HSIC CGL policy
issued to C&G. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that there are material questions of
fact which preclude the relief sought.
This case arises out of a renovation project undertaken by C&G at Suite 805, 2633
Napoleon Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana . On October 14, 2011, C&G contracted with RCIS
to perform certain demolition work on the project. Randy Cramer who is the Vice President of
RCIS allegedly oversaw the performance of certain demolition work between October 19 and 20,
2011, which allegedly caused catastrophic water damage throughout a large part of the building
sometime between Friday October 21, 2011 and Saturday October 22, 2011. Indeed, this event
has spawned three lawsuits in this court as well as a number of separate state court suits filed in
Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans.
The instant suit was lodged by C&G's insurer, HSIC, concerning whether coverage is
provided to RCIS under HSIC Policy No. HSLR18-00306-00. The coverage issue presented
centers on whether RCIS is an "employee, agent, project manager or representative of C&G" and
whether RCIS is an additional insured under this same policy. Determinations concerning
coverage in this instance hinge on highly contested facts concerning Randy Cramer's status in the
performance of this work. RCIS maintains that work undertaken on October 19 and 20, 2011
was performed as a subcontractor to C&G, but a walk through with the plumber and the
electrician who were to provide bids to C&G for their services, which occurred on October 21,
2011, was done on a voluntary basis and as such those actions were done as C&G's agent. These
allegations are supported by the affidavit and accompanying documents of Randy Cramer which
constitute competent evidence creating material questions of fact. Because of the causation
issues and the interlocking nature of these lawsuits, as well as the possibility that there could be
coverage based on other provisions in the subject policy, the motion is without merit.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Houston
Specialty Insurance Company ("HSIC") (Doc. 103) is DENIED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 23rd day of July, 2014.
STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?