Cornish v. Social Security Administration
Filing
25
ORDER: The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 21), and the failure of the Defendant to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation , hereby approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying Sylvester Cornish's Disability Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits is REVERSED AND REMANDED for further consideration of the record. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 1/23/2014.(rll, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SYLVESTER CORNISH
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 12-2746
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
SECTION: "G"(4)
ORDER
The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation,1 and the failure of the Defendant to file any objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation,2 hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision denying Sylvester
Cornish’s Disability Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits is REVERSED AND
REMANDED for further consideration of the record.
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this
day of January, 2014.
________________________________________
NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
2
Rec. Doc. 21.
The Court notes that the ten-day deadline for Defendant to file written objection was stayed from October
7, 2013 until October 18, 2013 as Defendant experienced a lapse of government appropriations. See Rec. Doc. 22;
Rec. Doc. 23. However, even considering the stay, the deadline to file objections has long since passed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?