Gibson v. Gusman et al

Filing 48

ORDER denying 43 Motion for Default Judgment, 44 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alma L. Chasez. (lag, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PHILIP GIBSON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER: 13-0463 MARLIN GUSMAN, ET AL. SECTION: "G"(5) ORDER ON MOTION SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 APPEARANCES: MOTION: (1) (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Rec. doc. 43). Plaintiff's Order to Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction (Rec. doc. 44). : Continued to : No opposition : Opposition ORDERED : Dismissed as moot. : Dismissed for failure of counsel to appear. : Granted. 1, 2 : Denied. 1: 2: : The Clerk of Court has not entered a default under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this case is subject to the provisions of the Prison Litigation and Reform Act which provides that no relief shall be granted to a plaintiff until the defendant has filed a reply. 42 U.S.C. ยง1997e(g)(1); Griffin v. Foti, No. 03-CV-1274, 2003 WL 22836493 at *1 (E.D. La. Nov. 24, 2003). Moreover, the Court's order of July 22, 2013 (rec. doc. 36) directed the defendants to file a response to plaintiff's motion for leave to supplement his complaint which they did on July 26, 2013. (Rec. doc. 37). The order did not direct the defendants to file an answer to plaintiff's supplemental complaint and, in any event, plaintiff's motion to supplement was denied on August 12, 2013. (Rec. doc. 38). Alleged mail interference was not pled by plaintiff in his original or supplemental complaints. (Rec. docs. 1, 4, 12). In addition, plaintiff makes no showing that his position as a litigant was prejudiced or that his legal mail was censored. Walker v. Navarro County Jail, 4 F.3d 410, 413 (5th Cir. 1993). Other. ALMA L. CHASEZ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?