Dion v. Low Land Construction Co., Inc.
Filing
49
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are three motions in limine (Rec. Docs. 28, 29, and 41). The Court rules on the motions as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/11/2014. (cbs) Modified on 7/11/2014 to edit document type (cbs).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
WILBERT DION
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 13-5222
LOW LAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
SECTION: āNā (3)
ORDER AND REASONS
Presently before the Court are three motions in limine (Rec. Docs. 28, 29, and 41).
The Court rules on the motions as stated herein.
IT IS ORDERED that the "Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony Regarding
Electric Winches or Any Other Variation of Cheater Pipe Not Aboard the LOW LAND 10" (Rec.
Doc. 28) is GRANTED for essentially the reasons stated by Defendant in the original and reply
memorandum (Rec. Docs. 28-1 and 38) submitted in support of its motion.
IT IS ORDERED that the "Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding
Subsequent Remedial Measures" (Rec. Doc. 29) is GRANTED for essentially the reasons stated by
Defendant in the original and reply memorandum (Rec. Docs. 29-1 and 40) submitted in support of
its motion.
IT IS ORDERED that, on the present showing made, the "Supplemental Motion in
Limine to Exclude the Testimony and Opinions of Captain James P. Jamison" (Rec. Doc. 41) is
DENIED to the extent that Defendant seeks to exclude Captain Jamison from offering any expert
testimony. Nevertheless, Plaintiff will be required to establish a proper factual foundation for that
testimony to be allowed at trial. Further, Captain Jamison will be permitted to testify only regarding
the operation of the type of winch and "cheater pipe" actually being used by Plaintiff at the time of
the incident at issue here.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 11th day of July 2014.
_________________________________
KURT D. ENGELHARDT
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?