Dion v. Low Land Construction Co., Inc.

Filing 49

ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are three motions in limine (Rec. Docs. 28, 29, and 41). The Court rules on the motions as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/11/2014. (cbs) Modified on 7/11/2014 to edit document type (cbs).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILBERT DION CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 13-5222 LOW LAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SECTION: ā€œNā€ (3) ORDER AND REASONS Presently before the Court are three motions in limine (Rec. Docs. 28, 29, and 41). The Court rules on the motions as stated herein. IT IS ORDERED that the "Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony Regarding Electric Winches or Any Other Variation of Cheater Pipe Not Aboard the LOW LAND 10" (Rec. Doc. 28) is GRANTED for essentially the reasons stated by Defendant in the original and reply memorandum (Rec. Docs. 28-1 and 38) submitted in support of its motion. IT IS ORDERED that the "Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Subsequent Remedial Measures" (Rec. Doc. 29) is GRANTED for essentially the reasons stated by Defendant in the original and reply memorandum (Rec. Docs. 29-1 and 40) submitted in support of its motion. IT IS ORDERED that, on the present showing made, the "Supplemental Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony and Opinions of Captain James P. Jamison" (Rec. Doc. 41) is DENIED to the extent that Defendant seeks to exclude Captain Jamison from offering any expert testimony. Nevertheless, Plaintiff will be required to establish a proper factual foundation for that testimony to be allowed at trial. Further, Captain Jamison will be permitted to testify only regarding the operation of the type of winch and "cheater pipe" actually being used by Plaintiff at the time of the incident at issue here. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 11th day of July 2014. _________________________________ KURT D. ENGELHARDT United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?