Oliveira v. Martins et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 62 ; ORDERED that Plaintiff's 56 Third Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs associated with filing the instant motion is GRANTED and shall be personally assessed against the Defendants Ionia Maria Martins and Brazilian Grill, LLC. The Plaintiff shall file within 10 days of this order a motion to fix attorneys' fees, along with attachments as stated herein. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/15/2017.(blg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CLEBER DESOUZA OLIVEIRA
IONIA MARIA MARTINS AND
BRAZILIAN GRILL, LLC
SECTION: “I” (4)
The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Report and
Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of the Defendants
to file an objection to the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves
the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its
opinion in this matter. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Third Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (R.
Doc. 56) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs
associated with filing the instant motion is GRANTED and shall be personally assessed against
the Defendants Ionia Maria Martins and Brazilian Grill, LLC. The Plaintiff shall file within ten
(10) days of this order a motion to fix attorneys’ fees, along with: (1) an affidavit attesting to their
attorney’s education, background, skills, and experience; (2) sufficient evidence of rates charged
in similar cases by other local attorneys with similar experience, skill and reputation; and (3) the
documentation required by Local Rule 54.2.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 15th day of November 2017
LANCE M. AFRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?