Trahan v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 ; Also, the Court has received Plaintiff's letter, filed June 23, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 8), which the Court construes as an additional Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HE REBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Rec. Doc. 1), insofar as it can be construed as a request for habeas corpus relief, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plainti ff's Motion to Amend Complaint to add claims under the Whistleblower Protection Act and the Federal Tort Claims Act (Rec. Doc. 6) is hereby GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims under Section 1983, the Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Federal Tort Claims Act are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Docket Number and In Forma Pauperis Status (Rec. Docs. 5 & 8) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT because Plaintiff's case was duly given a docket number at the time it was allotted and Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on May 14, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 3). FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff 's Motion to Seal Case (Rec. Doc. 4) is hereby DENIED for the reasons provided by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the record of this proceeding shall be UNSEALED. Plaintiff's related requests for copies to be made of alleged death threats are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 7/14/14.(sek)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NORMAN PAUL TRAHAN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ET AL SECTION: 14-1068 J O R D E R The Court, having considered the Complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 7), and the failure of any party to file a timely objection, hereby APPROVES the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Additionally, the Court has received Plaintiff's letter, filed June 23, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 8), which the Court construes as an additional Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Rec. Doc. 1), insofar as it can be construed as a request for habeas corpus relief, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint to add claims under the Whistleblower Protection Act and the Federal Tort Claims Act (Rec. Doc. 6) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims under Section 1983, the Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Federal Tort Claims Act are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Docket Number and In Forma Pauperis Status (Rec. Docs. 5 & 8) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT because Plaintiff's case was duly given a docket number at the time it was allotted and Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on May 14, 2014 (Rec. Doc. 3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Seal Case (Rec. Doc. 4) is hereby DENIED for the reasons provided by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the record of this proceeding shall be UNSEALED. Plaintiff's related requests for copies to be made of alleged death threats are hereby DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 14th day of July, 2014. ______________________________ CARL J. BARBIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?